The advent of photography in the mid-19th century acted as a catalyst for a fundamental shift in the art world. Prior to its invention, artists were largely tasked with the duty of capturing reality as accurately as possible, serving as the primary means for visually documenting people, places, and events. With the advent of the camera, this role was usurped, and artists were suddenly relieved of their obligation to represent reality with meticulous accuracy. Instead, they were offered a newfound freedom to explore alternative modes of representation, giving birth to an array of artistic movements that sought to interpret rather than depict reality. Referencing Aaron Scharf's "Art and Photography" (1968), this shift can be seen as the point where art started to transition away from a representational function towards a more interpretive one.
Impressionism, for instance, emerged in the late 19th century as a direct reaction to the newfound ubiquity of photography. Artists like Monet, Degas, and Renoir began to experiment with capturing fleeting moments of light and color, focusing more on their subjective perceptions than on the photographic accuracy of their subjects. This marked a significant shift from art as a means of rigid documentation to art as a means of personal expression and sensory exploration. As John House points out in "Impressionism: Paint and Politics" (2004), the Impressionists essentially sought to capture what the camera could not, thus redefining the very essence of what art could be.
From Impressionism sprang forth a series of increasingly abstract art movements, such as Expressionism, Cubism, and Surrealism, each pushing the boundaries of representation further and further. Modern art, in essence, owes its existence to this liberation from photorealism, which began with the advent of photography.
Fast forward to the present day, and we find ourselves in the midst of another technological revolution that is reshaping the art world: artificial intelligence. AI, like photography in its time, is liberating artists in unprecedented ways, allowing for the exploration of creative realms that were previously inconceivable. Machine learning algorithms can generate compelling artworks, and are capable of creating original images that blur the line between human and machine-made art. As noted by Elgammal et al. in "CAN: Creative Adversarial Networks, Generating"Art" by Learning About Styles and Deviating from Style Norms" (2017), AI is not merely replicating human creativity, but is fostering an entirely new form of it. As such, we stand on the precipice of a new era of artistic innovation, one that may redefine art in the same way that photography did over a century ago.
<< when perspectival drawing was invented at the beginning of the last Renaissance, there was an uproar (especially from the predominant paradigm of the Church)
how dare people simulate 3D reality from a singular perspective on 2D canvas!
“it’s not art!”
now, perspective is being extended again >>
Masso SalmassiExcellent article and writing flow.! Masso SalmassiSo what is next for photo processing apps and software? If they augment "Ai' " into their package, they may have to limit the activity capped to cloud access. Peter HollinghurstA thought provoking article, thanks. Just a heads up though - these AIs are not GANS. GANs were an earlier stage of AI which some thought were going to be the future of AI image making, but these newer Diffusion AIs are just way more flexible especially when combined with large language models. GANs do still have their uses, but are increasingly getting sidelined in image creation now. Dan Cohen: Kyle Hailey Peter Hollinghurst You both make interesting points, although I maintain that while technology is a…